↓ Skip to main content

Identification of three novel TECTA mutations in Iranian families with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing impairment at the DFNB21 locus

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identification of three novel TECTA mutations in Iranian families with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing impairment at the DFNB21 locus
Published in
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, June 2007
DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.31718
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Forty-five consanguineous Iranian families segregating autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL) and negative for mutations at the DFNB1 locus were screened for allele segregation consistent with homozygosity by descent (HBD) at the DFNB21 locus. In three families demonstrating HBD at this locus, mutation screening of TECTA led to the identification of three novel homozygous mutations: one frameshift mutation (266delT), a transversion of a cytosine to an adenine (5,211C > A) leading to a stop codon, and a 9.6 kb deletion removing exon 10. In total, six mutations in TECTA have now been described in families segregating ARNSHL. All of these mutations are inactivating and produce a similar phenotype that is characterized by moderate-to-severe hearing loss across frequencies with a mid frequency dip. The truncating nature of these mutations is consistent with loss-of-function, and therefore the existing TECTA knockout mouse mutant represents a good model in which to study DFNB21-related deafness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Neuroscience 3 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,425,541
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#1,408
of 4,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,245
of 117,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.