↓ Skip to main content

Some Surprising Implications of NMR-directed Simulations of Substrate Recognition and Binding by Cytochrome P450cam (CYP101A1)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Biology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Some Surprising Implications of NMR-directed Simulations of Substrate Recognition and Binding by Cytochrome P450cam (CYP101A1)
Published in
Journal of Molecular Biology, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.03.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cytochrome P450cam(CYP101A1) catalyzes the stereospecific 5-exo hydroxylation of d-camphor by molecular oxygen. Previously, residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) measured for backbone amide1H-15N correlations in both substrate-free and bound forms of CYP101A1 were used as restraints in soft annealing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in order to identify average conformations of the enzyme with and without substrate bound. Multiple substrate-dependent conformational changes remote from the enzyme active site were identified, and site-directed mutagenesis and activity assays confirmed the importance of these changes in substrate recognition. The current work makes use of perturbation response scanning (PRS) and umbrella sampling MD of the RDC-derived CYP101A1 structures to probe the roles of remote structural features in enforcing the regio- and stereospecific nature of the hydroxylation reaction catalyzed by CYP101A1. An improper dihedral angle Ψ was defined and used to maintain substrate orientation in the CYP101A1 active site, and it was observed that different values of Ψ result in different PRS response maps. Umbrella sampling methods show that the free energy of the system is sensitive to Ψ, and bound substrate forms an important mechanical link in the transmission of mechanical coupling through the enzyme structure. Finally, a qualitative approach to interpreting PRS maps in terms of the roles of secondary structural features is proposed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#11,580
of 11,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,595
of 344,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#77
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.