↓ Skip to main content

Non-pharmacological management of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non-pharmacological management of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus
Published in
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.siny.2018.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The association between the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and neonatal morbidity, mortality and poor neurodevelopmental outcome in later childhood has been the focus of intense debate for decades. The lack of evidence supporting therapeutic strategies aimed at achieving PDA closure has led to the widespread adoption of conservative management aimed at mitigating the impact of shunt volume without achieving ductal closure. In this article, we review this management approach, describe the supportive evidence and potential complications associated with this strategy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,186,287
of 29,452,325 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
#429
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,555
of 359,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,452,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.