↓ Skip to main content

β-Arrestins regulate a Ral-GDS–Ral effector pathway that mediates cytoskeletal reorganization

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Cell Biology, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
β-Arrestins regulate a Ral-GDS–Ral effector pathway that mediates cytoskeletal reorganization
Published in
Nature Cell Biology, July 2002
DOI 10.1038/ncb821
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

beta-Arrestins are important in chemoattractant receptor-induced granule release, a process that may involve Ral-dependent regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. We have identified the Ral GDP dissociation stimulator (Ral-GDS) as a beta-arrestin-binding protein by yeast two-hybrid screening and co-immunoprecipitation from human polymorphonuclear neutrophilic leukocytes (PMNs). Under basal conditions, Ral-GDS is localized to the cytosol and remains inactive in a complex formed with beta-arrestins. In response to formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP) receptor stimulation, beta-arrestin Ral-GDS protein complexes dissociate and Ral-GDS translocates with beta-arrestin from the cytosol to the plasma membrane, resulting in the Ras-independent activation of the Ral effector pathway required for cytoskeletal rearrangement. The subsequent re-association of beta-arrestin Ral-GDS complexes is associated with the inactivation of Ral signalling. Thus, beta-arrestins regulate multiple steps in the Ral-dependent processes that result in chemoattractant-induced cytoskeletal reorganization.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2025.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cell Biology
#2,549
of 3,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,107
of 44,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cell Biology
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.