↓ Skip to main content

Paratracheal Paraseptal Emphysema and Expiratory Central Airway Collapse in Smokers

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Paratracheal Paraseptal Emphysema and Expiratory Central Airway Collapse in Smokers
Published in
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, April 2018
DOI 10.1513/annalsats.201709-713oc
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Expiratory central airway collapse (ECAC) is associated with respiratory morbidity independent of underlying lung disease. However, not all smokers develop ECAC and the etiology of ECAC in adult smokers is unclear. Paraseptal emphysema in the paratracheal location, by untethering airway walls, may predispose smokers to developing ECAC. To evaluate whether paratracheal paraseptal emphysema (paratracheal PSE) is associated with ECAC. We analyzed paired inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography scans from participants enrolled in a multicenter study (COPDGene) of smokers aged 45-80 years. ECAC was defined as >50% reduction in cross sectional area of the trachea during expiration. In a nested case-control design, participants with and without ECAC were included in a 1:2 fashion, and inspiratory scans were further analyzed using the Fleischner Society criteria for presence of centrilobular emphysema, paraseptal emphysema, airway wall thickening, and paratracheal PSE (maximal diameter > 0.5 cm). 1320 patients were included, 440 with and 880 without ECAC. Those with ECAC were older, had higher BMI, and were less likely to be male or current smokers. Paratracheal PSE was more frequent in those with ECAC than controls (16.6% vs. 11.8%; p=0.016), and after adjustment for age, race, sex, body-mass-index, smoking pack-years, and FEV1, paratracheal PSE was independently associated with ECAC (adjusted OR 1.53, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.98; p=0.001). Further, increasing size of paratracheal PSE (maximal diameter of at least 1 cm and 1.5 cm) was associated with greater odds of ECAC (adjusted OR 1.63, 95%CI 1.18 to 2.25; p=0.003 and 1.77, 95%CI 1.19 to 2.64; p=0.005, respectively). Paraseptal emphysema adjacent to the trachea is associated with ECAC. The identification of this risk factor on inspiratory scans should prompt further evaluation for ECAC. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00608764).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 34%
Unspecified 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,005,756
of 31,701,846 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#1,302
of 3,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,067
of 359,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#28
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,701,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.