↓ Skip to main content

Mammalian single‐stranded DNA binding protein UP I is derived from the hnRNP core protein A1.

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Journal, September 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mammalian single‐stranded DNA binding protein UP I is derived from the hnRNP core protein A1.
Published in
EMBO Journal, September 1986
DOI 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04494.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Antibodies induced against mammalian single-stranded DNA binding protein (ssDBP) UP I were shown to be cross-reactive with most of the basic hnRNP core proteins, the main constituents of 40S hnRNP particles. This suggested a structural relationship between both groups of proteins. Using the anti-ssDBP antibodies, a cDNA clone (pRP10) was isolated from a human liver cDNA library in plasmid expression vector pEX1. By DNA sequencing this clone was shown to encode in its 949 bp insert the last 72 carboxy terminal amino acids of the ssDBP UP I. Thereafter, an open reading frame continued for another 124 amino acids followed by a UAA (ochre) stop codon. Direct amino acid sequencing of a V8 protease peptide from hnRNP core protein A1 showed that this peptide contained at its amino terminus the last 11 amino acids of UP I followed by 19 amino acids which are encoded by the open reading frame of cDNA clone pRP10 immediately following the UP I sequence. This proves that ssDBP UP I arises by proteolysis from hnRNP core protein A1. This finding must lead to a re-evaluation of the possible physiological role of UP I and related ssDBPs. The formerly assumed function in DNA replication, although not completely ruled out, should be reconsidered in the light of a possible alternative or complementary function in hnRNA processing where UP I could either be a simple degradation product of core protein A1 (as a consequence of controlling the levels of active A1) or may continue to function as an RNA binding protein which has lost the ability to interact with the other core proteins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 14%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 36%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2026.
All research outputs
#7,633,242
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Journal
#5,810
of 14,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,672
of 16,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Journal
#27
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.