↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Oxidative Stress and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Nephrology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Oxidative Stress and Beyond
Published in
Seminars in Nephrology, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The kidneys are highly metabolic organs that produce vast quantities of adenosine triphosphate via oxidative phosphorylation and, as such, contain many mitochondria. Although mitochondrial reactive oxygen species are involved in many physiological processes in the kidneys, there is a plethora of evidence to suggest that excessive production may be a pathologic mediator of many chronic kidney diseases, including diabetic kidney disease. Despite this, results from clinical testing of antioxidant therapies have been generally underwhelming. However, given the many roles of mitochondria in cellular functioning, pathways other than reactive oxygen species production may prevail as pathologic mediators in diabetic kidney disease. Accordingly, in this review, mitochondrial dysfunction in a broader context is discussed, specifically focusing on mitochondrial respiration and oxygen consumption, intrarenal hypoxia, oxidative stress, mitochondrial uncoupling, and networking.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 22 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#11,263,503
of 34,601,289 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Nephrology
#396
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,196
of 374,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Nephrology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.