↓ Skip to main content

Anaerobic killing of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa by acidified nitrite derivatives under cystic fibrosis airway conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anaerobic killing of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa by acidified nitrite derivatives under cystic fibrosis airway conditions
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, January 2006
DOI 10.1172/jci24684
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Engineering 8 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,056,682
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#6,724
of 20,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,477
of 234,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#37
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.