↓ Skip to main content

The fatty acid transport function of fatty acid-binding proteins

Overview of attention for article published in BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The fatty acid transport function of fatty acid-binding proteins
Published in
BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids, June 2000
DOI 10.1016/s1388-1981(00)00046-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The intracellular fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) comprise a family of 14-15 kDa proteins which bind long-chain fatty acids. A role for FABPs in fatty acid transport has been hypothesized for several decades, and the accumulated indirect and correlative evidence is largely supportive of this proposed function. In recent years, a number of experimental approaches which more directly examine the transport function of FABPs have been taken. These include molecular level in vitro modeling of fatty acid transfer mechanisms, whole cell studies of fatty acid uptake and intracellular transfer following genetic manipulation of FABP type and amount, and an examination of cells and tissues from animals engineered to lack expression of specific FABPs. Collectively, data from these studies have provided strong support for defining the FABPs as fatty acid transport proteins. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the fundamental mechanisms by which cellular fatty acid trafficking is modulated by the FABPs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 225 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 26%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 8%
Chemistry 11 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 48 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2025.
All research outputs
#5,140,457
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids
#249
of 2,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,481
of 58,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BBA - Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.