↓ Skip to main content

Fall survival of American woodcock in the western Great Lakes Region

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fall survival of American woodcock in the western Great Lakes Region
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.547
Authors

John G. Bruggink, Eileen J. Oppelt, Kevin E. Doherty, David E. Andersen, Jed Meunier, R. Scott Lutz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Researcher 3 13%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 43%
Environmental Science 7 30%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#2,589
of 2,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,198
of 212,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.