↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
26 patents

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Safety Profile and Metabolic Effects of 14 Days of Treatment with DIO-902: Results of a Phase IIa Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Published in
Clinical Therapeutics, June 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We examined seasonality and annual trends for dengue cases among 522 returned travelers reported to the international GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Dengue cases showed region-specific peaks for Southeast Asia (June, September), South Central Asia (October), South America (March), and the Caribbean (August, October). Travel-related dengue exhibited annual oscillations with several epidemics occurring during the study period. In Southeast Asia, annual proportionate morbidity increased from 50 dengue cases per 1,000 ill returned travelers in nonepidemic years to an average of 159 cases per 1,000 travelers during epidemic years. Dengue can thus be added to the list of diseases for which pretravel advice should include information on relative risk according to season. Also, dengue cases detected at atypical times in sentinel travelers may inform the international community of the onset of epidemic activity in specific areas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2026.
All research outputs
#3,438,087
of 30,697,671 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Therapeutics
#423
of 4,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,489
of 117,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Therapeutics
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,697,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.