↓ Skip to main content

State Medicaid Eligibility Criteria and Unmet Preventive Dental Care Need for CSHCN

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
State Medicaid Eligibility Criteria and Unmet Preventive Dental Care Need for CSHCN
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10995-015-1843-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Objective To determine if Medicaid eligibility is associated with unmet preventive dental care need for Medicaid-enrolled CSHCN. Methods We analyzed the 2009-2010 National Survey of CSHCN and focused on Medicaid-enrolled children ages 3-17. The outcome measure was parent-reported unmet need for preventive dental care. The predictor variable was state Medicaid eligibility criteria, categorized as broad [>250 % Federal Poverty Level (FPL)], moderate (200-249 % FPL), and narrow (<200 % FPL). Multiple variable multilevel logistic regression models estimated the association between state-level eligibility criteria and variability in unmet need. Results The multilevel models indicated no significant association between Medicaid eligibility criteria and unmet preventive dental care need. CSHCN with more severe chronic health conditions had significantly greater odds of unmet need (OR 1.52; 95 % CI 1.28, 1.82) and CSHCN with a medical home had significantly lower odds (OR 0.61; 95 % CI 0.50, 0.75). Conclusions for practice There is significant state variability in unmet need for preventive dental care for Medicaid-enrolled CSHCN. Broadening Medicaid eligibility criteria alone is not likely to address the preventive dental care needs of CSHCN, which has policy implications for improving oral health disparities for publicly-insured CSHCN.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Librarian 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Social Sciences 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#839
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,597
of 288,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#23
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.