↓ Skip to main content

Preparation of the Speech-LanguagePathologist Specializing in Voice An Educational Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Voice, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preparation of the Speech-LanguagePathologist Specializing in Voice An Educational Survey
Published in
Journal of Voice, June 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0892-1997(01)00024-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study investigates the academic and clinical preparation a speech-language pathologist receives in the area of voice. The purpose is to determine how to structure continuing education and specialty training in vocology, defined as the science and practice of voice habilitation. Surveys were sent to the graduate programs in speech-language pathology accredited by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) in 1994, and again in 1999. Results from the 1994 survey indicated that students received limited information and clinical experience in handling typical voice cases. Although most programs required a voice disorders course, fewer mandated coursework in normal voice production or clinical experience with voice patients. The follow-up survey showed that the educational environment in 1999 is similar to that in 1994. It is evident that the programs are in compliance with the Educational Training Board model developed by ASHA for basic clinical competence, but no structure for specialty training has yet emerged.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Linguistics 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2008.
All research outputs
#9,514,305
of 27,773,453 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Voice
#465
of 2,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,958
of 47,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Voice
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,773,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,453 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them