↓ Skip to main content

Zinc hydrolases: the mechanisms of zinc-dependent deacetylases

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Biochemistry & Biophysics, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Zinc hydrolases: the mechanisms of zinc-dependent deacetylases
Published in
Archives of Biochemistry & Biophysics, January 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.abb.2004.08.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A class of metalloenzymes, known as zinc hydrolases, catalyze a variety of hydrolytic reactions on many different substrates in important metabolic pathways. Deacetylation is an example of one of the types of reactions catalyzed by zinc hydrolases. The biological importance of the reactions catalyzed by many zinc hydrolases, including zinc-dependent deacetylases, has made these enzymes pharmaceutical targets for the development of inhibitors and, therefore, a clear understanding of the mechanisms of these enzymes is warranted. This review focuses on the current understanding of the mechanisms catalyzed by various zinc-dependent deacetylases and, in particular, the reaction mechanism catalyzed by the enzyme UDP-3-O-(R-3-hydroxymyristoyl)-N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase, also known as LpxC. In general, the zinc-water functions as the nucleophile with zinc stabilization of the tetrahedral intermediate and general-acid-base catalysis (GABC) provided by enzyme residue(s). Two types of GABC mechanisms have been identified, one that uses a single bifunctional GABC and another that uses a GABC pair.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 28%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 26%
Chemistry 33 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,344,472
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Biochemistry & Biophysics
#2,865
of 7,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,136
of 211,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Biochemistry & Biophysics
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.