In this paper, a method of three-dimensional (3D) vessel localization is presented to allow the identification of a vessel of interest, the selection of a vessel segment, and the determination of a slice orientation to improve the accuracy of phase-contrast magnetic resonance (PCMR) angiography. A marching-cube surface-rendering algorithm was used to reconstruct the 3D vasculature. Surface-rendering was obtained using an iso-surface value determined from a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image. This 3D vasculature was used to find a vessel of interest, select a vessel segment, and to determine the slice orientation perpendicular to the vessel axis. Volumetric flow rate (VFR) was obtained in a phantom model and in vivo using 3D localization with double oblique cine PCMR scanning. PCMR flow measurements in the phantom showed 5. 2% maximum error and a standard deviation of 9 mL/min during steady flow, 7.9% maximum error and a standard deviation of 13 mL/min during pulsatile flow compared with measurements using an ultrasonic transit-time flowmeter. PCMR VFR measurement error increased with misalignment at 10, 20, and 30 degrees oblique to the perpendicular slice in vitro and in vivo. The 3D localization technique allowed precise localization of the vessel of interest and optimal placement of the slice orientation for minimum error in flow measurements.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,778,791
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (0730725X)
#57
of 2,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,673
of 57,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (0730725X)
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
