↓ Skip to main content

Human Pregnane X Receptor: Genetic Polymorphisms, Alternative mRNA Splice Variants, and Cytochrome P450 3A Metabolic Activity

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Human Pregnane X Receptor: Genetic Polymorphisms, Alternative mRNA Splice Variants, and Cytochrome P450 3A Metabolic Activity
Published in
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 2013
DOI 10.1177/0091270006292125
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human pregnane X receptor (hPXR) gene polymorphisms (spanning exon 2 to exon 5) and alternative mRNA splicing were investigated as possible contributors to individual variability in CYP3A metabolic activity measured both in vivo and in vitro. None of the 9 variants evaluated, including the 2 most common nonsynonymous variants (Pro27Ser and Gly36Arg), was found to be associated with midazolam 1'-hydroxylation rate measured in a bank of human livers (48 European Americans, 4 African Americans, 2 Hispanics). In contrast, 3 linked hPXR variants (g.252A > G, g.275A > G, and g.4760G > A) were significantly (P < .05) associated with oral midazolam clearance in a mixed race/ethnicity population (n = 26) and the African American subpopulation (n = 14) but not in European Americans (n = 9). Although the amount of hPXR mRNA normally spliced at the exon 4-5 junction correlated well with midazolam 1'-hydroxylation activities (P < .05), none of the 6 hPXR mRNA splice variants identified was associated with midazolam 1'-hydroxylation. In conclusion, several hPXR polymorphisms have been identified that may have predictive value for oral midazolam clearance, particularly in African Americans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Netherlands 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Energy 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#803
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,449
of 208,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#417
of 1,321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.