↓ Skip to main content

The human Nup107–160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Journal, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The human Nup107–160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions
Published in
EMBO Journal, March 2007
DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601642
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We previously demonstrated that a fraction of the human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex is recruited to kinetochores at the onset of mitosis. However, the molecular determinants for its kinetochore targeting and the functional significance of this localization were not investigated. Here, we show that the Nup107-160 complex interacts with CENP-F, but that CENP-F only moderately contributes to its targeting to kinetochores. In addition, we show that the recruitment of the Nup107-160 complex to kinetochores mainly depends on the Ndc80 complex. We further demonstrate that efficient depletion of the Nup107-160 complex from kinetochores, achieved either by combining siRNAs targeting several of its subunits excluding Seh1, or by depleting Seh1 alone, induces a mitotic delay. Further analysis of Seh1-depleted cells revealed impaired chromosome congression, reduced kinetochore tension and kinetochore-microtubule attachment defects. Finally, we show that the presence of the Nup107-160 complex at kinetochores is required for the recruitment of Crm1 and RanGAP1-RanBP2 to these structures. Together, our data thus provide the first molecular clues underlying the function of the human Nup107-160 complex at kinetochores.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 152 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 26%
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Professor 7 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Chemistry 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2007.
All research outputs
#12,527,291
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Journal
#9,034
of 14,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,296
of 131,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Journal
#51
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.