↓ Skip to main content

Functional domains in tetraspanin proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional domains in tetraspanin proteins
Published in
Trends in Biochemical Sciences, February 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0968-0004(02)00014-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exciting new findings have emerged about the structure, function and biochemistry of tetraspanin proteins. Five distinct tetraspanin regions have now been delineated linking structural features to specific functions. Within the large extracellular loop of tetraspanins, there is a variable region that mediates specific interactions with other proteins, as well as a more highly conserved region that has been suggested to mediate homodimerization. Within the transmembrane region, the four tetraspanin transmembrane domains are probable sites of both intra- and inter-molecular interactions that are crucial during biosynthesis and assembly of the network of tetraspanin-linked membrane proteins known as the 'tetraspanin web'. In the intracellular juxtamembrane region, palmitoylation of cysteine residues also contributes to tetraspanin web assembly, and the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail region could provide specific functional links to cytoskeletal or signaling proteins.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 261 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Researcher 45 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Student > Master 28 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 5%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 59 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Chemistry 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 60 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,930,755
of 33,276,949 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biochemical Sciences
#659
of 3,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,746
of 192,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biochemical Sciences
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,276,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.