↓ Skip to main content

Linear-After-The-Exponential (LATE)-PCR: Primer design criteria for high yields of specific single-stranded DNA and improved real-time detection

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
53 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Linear-After-The-Exponential (LATE)-PCR: Primer design criteria for high yields of specific single-stranded DNA and improved real-time detection
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2005
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0501946102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
Portugal 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 190 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 19%
Other 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 24 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Engineering 10 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 28 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2026.
All research outputs
#2,948,542
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#32,687
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,093
of 97,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#94
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.