↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in COL11A2 cause non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNA13)

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutations in COL11A2 cause non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNA13)
Published in
Nature Genetics, December 1999
DOI 10.1038/70516
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report that mutation of COL11A2 causes deafness previously mapped to the DFNA13 locus on chromosome 6p. We found two families (one American and one Dutch) with autosomal dominant, non-syndromic hearing loss to have mutations in COL11A2 that are predicted to affect the triple-helix domain of the collagen protein. In both families, deafness is non-progressive and predominantly affects middle frequencies. Mice with a targeted disruption of Col11a2 also were shown to have hearing loss. Electron microscopy of the tectorial membrane of these mice revealed loss of organization of the collagen fibrils. Our findings revealed a unique ultrastructural malformation of inner-ear architecture associated with non-syndromic hearing loss, and suggest that tectorial membrane abnormalities may be one aetiology of sensorineural hearing loss primarily affecting the mid-frequencies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2025.
All research outputs
#6,689,358
of 30,990,086 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#5,355
of 8,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,264
of 137,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#37
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,990,086 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.