You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Subvirion Monovalent Unadjuvanted Inactivated Influenza A(H3N2) Variant Vaccine in Healthy Persons ≥18 Years Old
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Infectious Diseases, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/infdis/jiv056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy A. Keitel, Lisa A. Jackson, Srilatha Edupuganti, Patricia L. Winokur, Mark J. Mulligan, Natalie J. Thornburg, Shital M. Patel, Nadine G. Rouphael, Lilin Lai, Sandhya Bangaru, Monica M. McNeal, Abbie R. Bellamy, Heather R. Hill, for the VTEU H3N2v Vaccine Study Work Group, Nanette Bond, Kathy Bosworth, Janet Brown, Jess Banay, Coni Cheesman, Tracey Lanford, Flor Munoz, Janet Wells, Barb Carste, Maya Dunstan, Angel Mathis, Mihir Parikh, C. Hallie Phillips, Alyssa Spingola, Pat Starkovich, Janice Suyehira, Allison Beck, Karen Mask, Mary Bower, Eileen Osinski, Nayoka Rimann, Pamela Turner, DongLi Wang, Jack Stapleton, Regina Won, Nancy Wagner, Geraldine Dull, Necole Gerot, Mary Reidy, Dan Zhao, Ellen Segar, James C. Slaughter, Megan McDonough, Fenhua He, Robert Salata, Cody Meissner, Jeanne Sheffield, Michael Spigarelli, Stephen Greenberg, Anoop Agrawal, Sascha Dublin, David Arterburn, David Rimland, Bruce Ribner, Jeff Meier, Wendy Buchanan, Soju Chang, Linda Lambert, Suzanne Murray, Valerie Riddle, David Spiro |
| Abstract |
Variant influenza A/H3N2 viruses (H3N2v) have transmitted recently from pigs to humans in the US. Vaccines strategies are needed. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,979,702
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#10,906
of 19,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,828
of 409,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#76
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.