↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Structural Model for the HIV-1 Rev–RRE Complex Deduced from Altered-Specificity Rev Variants Isolated by a Rapid Genetic Strategy
Published in
Cell, October 1996
DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81328-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A broadly applicable genetic strategy was developed for investigating RNA-protein interactions and applied to the HIV-1 Rev protein. By rapidly screening thousands of Rev-RNA interactions in Escherichia coli, we isolated Rev suppressor mutations that alleviated the deleterious effect of mutations in RRE stem-loop IIB, the high affinity RNA-binding site for Rev. All of these suppressor mutations map to a single arginine-deficient face of a Rev alpha-helix, and some alter the binding specificity of the protein, providing genetic evidence for direct contacts between specific Rev amino acids and RNA nucleotides in the RNA complex of Rev. The spatial constraints suggested by these data have enabled us to model the structure of this complex.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 27%
Chemistry 5 14%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2001.
All research outputs
#6,087,116
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#10,576
of 17,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,988
of 30,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#44
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.