↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
24 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ultrasmooth organic–inorganic perovskite thin-film formation and crystallization for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7142
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To date, there have been a plethora of reports on different means to fabricate organic-inorganic metal halide perovskite thin films; however, the inorganic starting materials have been limited to halide-based anions. Here we study the role of the anions in the perovskite solution and their influence upon perovskite crystal growth, film formation and device performance. We find that by using a non-halide lead source (lead acetate) instead of lead chloride or iodide, the perovskite crystal growth is much faster, which allows us to obtain ultrasmooth and almost pinhole-free perovskite films by a simple one-step solution coating with only a few minutes annealing. This synthesis leads to improved device performance in planar heterojunction architectures and answers a critical question as to the role of the anion and excess organic component during crystallization. Our work paves the way to tune the crystal growth kinetics by simple chemistry.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1077 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 351 31%
Researcher 169 15%
Student > Master 157 14%
Student > Bachelor 85 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 5%
Other 136 12%
Unknown 162 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 295 26%
Physics and Astronomy 189 17%
Chemistry 173 15%
Engineering 118 11%
Energy 70 6%
Other 55 5%
Unknown 217 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2026.
All research outputs
#1,072,556
of 33,276,949 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#17,890
of 81,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,979
of 401,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#143
of 724 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,276,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 724 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.