↓ Skip to main content

From receptor recognition mechanisms to bioinspired mimetic antagonists in HIV-1/cell docking

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
From receptor recognition mechanisms to bioinspired mimetic antagonists in HIV-1/cell docking
Published in
Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, April 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00567-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Understanding the ways in which two or more proteins interact may give insight into underlying binding and activation mechanisms in biology, methods for protein separation and structure-based antagonism. This review describes ways in which protein recognition has been explored in our laboratory for the HIV-1/cell entry process. Initial contact between an HIV-1 virion particle and a human cell occurs between gp120 (an HIV-1 envelope protein) and CD4 (a human extracellular signaling protein). This interaction leads to a sequence of events which includes a conformational change in gp120, fusion of the HIV-1 and cellular membranes and eventual infection of the cell. Using an optical biosensor and a reporter antibody, we have been able to measure the conformational change in gp120 that occurs upon CD4 binding. We also have used this biosensor system to characterize CD4 mimetics, obtained by peptide synthesis in miniprotein scaffolds. Phage display techniques have been employed to identify novel miniprotein sequences. The combination of biosensor interaction kinetics analysis and phage display provides a useful approach for understanding the recognition mechanisms involved in the HIV/cell docking process. This approach may also be useful in investigating other protein complexes of importance in health and disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Student > Master 2 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#9,515,244
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications
#95
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,292
of 48,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.