↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in PHF6 are associated with Börjeson–Forssman –Lehmann syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutations in PHF6 are associated with Börjeson–Forssman –Lehmann syndrome
Published in
Nature Genetics, November 2002
DOI 10.1038/ng1040
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Börjeson-Forssman-Lehmann syndrome (BFLS; OMIM 301900) is characterized by moderate to severe mental retardation, epilepsy, hypogonadism, hypometabolism, obesity with marked gynecomastia, swelling of subcutaneous tissue of the face, narrow palpebral fissure and large but not deformed ears. Previously, the gene associated with BFLS was localized to 17 Mb in Xq26-q27 (refs 2-4). We have reduced this interval to roughly 9 Mb containing more than 62 genes. Among these, a novel, widely expressed zinc-finger (plant homeodomain (PHD)-like finger) gene (PHF6) had eight different missense and truncation mutations in seven familial and two sporadic cases of BFLS. Transient transfection studies with PHF6 tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) showed diffuse nuclear staining with prominent nucleolar accumulation. Such localization, and the presence of two PHD-like zinc fingers, is suggestive of a role for PHF6 in transcription.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,741,231
of 31,393,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#5,386
of 8,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,694
of 71,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#37
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,393,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.