↓ Skip to main content

Association rules method and big data: Evaluating frequent medication combinations associated with fractures in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association rules method and big data: Evaluating frequent medication combinations associated with fractures in older adults
Published in
Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/pds.4432
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The association rules method is a novel methodology to ascertain patterns of medication use and combinations associated with adverse drug events. The aim of this case-crossover study was to apply the association rules method to ascertain medication combinations contributing to the risk of fractures in older adults. A nationwide representative sample of New Zealanders aged ≥65 years was sourced from the pharmaceutical collection. The first-time coded diagnosis of fracture was extracted from the National Minimum Dataset. Association rule method is a data mining technique that can be used to quickly traverse big datasets to identify a combination of items that co-occur. The association rules method were applied to identify frequent 11 medication combinations in the case and the control periods (1-14 days as hazard period, with 35-day washout period), and the association of fractures with each frequent medication combination were tested by computing a matched odd ratio (OR) and its 95% CI. We identified a total of 72 184 individuals (mean age 81.5 years) from 2005 to 2014 with incident fracture and exposed to at least 1 medication of interest. The association rules method revealed codeine phosphate (aOR = 11.50, 95% CI, 7.09-15.20, concomitantly with ibuprofen), zopiclone (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI, 1.49-3.67, concomitantly with morphine) and quetiapine (OR = 1.95, 95% CI, 1.28-2.98, concomitantly with zopiclone) were associated with fractures. The association rules method identified medication exposure combinations containing psychotropic medications and codeine are frequently associated with fractures. This novel methodology applied to big data can be an important tool to ascertain medication combinations associated with adverse drug events.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Computer Science 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 20 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,358,918
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
#1,102
of 2,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,231
of 371,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.