↓ Skip to main content

Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Health & Psychology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
603 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Health & Psychology, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 602 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 17%
Student > Master 81 13%
Researcher 63 10%
Student > Bachelor 52 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 98 16%
Unknown 170 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 134 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 9%
Social Sciences 56 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 32 5%
Other 94 16%
Unknown 185 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,910,145
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Health & Psychology
#116
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,663
of 410,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Health & Psychology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them