↓ Skip to main content

Increased sucrose intake is not associated with a change in glucose or insulin sensitivity in people with type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Increased sucrose intake is not associated with a change in glucose or insulin sensitivity in people with type 2 diabetes
Published in
International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition, July 2009
DOI 10.1080/09637480701395523
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Debate continues over the role of sucrose and sucrose-containing food in the diet for people with type 2 diabetes. Traditionally, dietary recommendations have suggested sucrose be reduced to a minimum level to improve glycaemic control. More recently the American Diabetes Association evidence-based guidelines have suggested a more liberal approach.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 17%
Librarian 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,197,391
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition
#317
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,493
of 173,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Food Sciences & Nutrition
#72
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.