↓ Skip to main content

Temporal phosphorylation of the Drosophila period protein.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Temporal phosphorylation of the Drosophila period protein.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1994
DOI 10.1073/pnas.91.6.2260
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The period gene (per) is required for Drosophila melanogaster to manifest circadian (congruent to 24 hr) rhythms. We report here that per protein (PER) undergoes daily oscillations in apparent molecular mass as well as abundance. The mobility changes are largely or exclusively due to multiple phosphorylation events. The temporal profile of the classic short-period form of PER (PERS) is altered in a manner consistent with the mutant strain's behavioral phenotype. As changes in abundance and phosphorylation persist under constant environmental conditions, they reflect or contribute to a free-running rhythm. We suggest that the phosphorylation status of PER is an important determinant in the Drosophila clock's time-keeping mechanism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Neuroscience 12 10%
Chemistry 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,140,738
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#48,571
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,069
of 31,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#99
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.