↓ Skip to main content

Predicting microRNA targets and functions: traps for the unwary

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting microRNA targets and functions: traps for the unwary
Published in
Nature Methods, June 2009
DOI 10.1038/nmeth0609-397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 5%
Germany 3 2%
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Caledonia 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 166 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 29%
Student > Master 15 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 8 4%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Computer Science 11 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 12 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#3,613
of 4,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,273
of 113,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#36
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.