↓ Skip to main content

A COMMUNITY-BASED STUDY OF SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE ONSET OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AND IDIOPATHIC CHRONIC FATIGUE

Overview of attention for article published in Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A COMMUNITY-BASED STUDY OF SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE ONSET OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AND IDIOPATHIC CHRONIC FATIGUE
Published in
Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, July 2009
DOI 10.1081/cbi-100103194
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

One proposed hypothesis regarding the etiology of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is that there is a subgroup of patients in which symptom onset is precipitated by a viral infection. If this is indeed true, then one would anticipate a greater incidence of the emergence of CFS symptoms during months when viral infections occur with the greatest frequency. The current community-based epidemiology study examined the month of symptom onset for 31 patients with CFS and 44 others with idiopathic chronic fatigue (ICF). It was determined that the distribution of the month of illness onset for the CFS and ICF groups was nonrandom, with greater numbers of participants than expected reporting an onset of CFS and ICF during January.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Other 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 24%
Psychology 4 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2026.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#1,254
of 1,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,859
of 172,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#305
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.