↓ Skip to main content

The molecular pruning of a phosphoramidate peptidomimetic inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen

Overview of attention for article published in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
37 patents

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The molecular pruning of a phosphoramidate peptidomimetic inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen
Published in
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, August 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.07.028
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To identify the pharmacophore of a phosphoramidate peptidomimetic inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a small analog library was designed and screened for inhibitory potency against PSMA. The design of the lead inhibitor was based upon N-acyl derivatives of endogenous substrate folyl-gamma-Glu and incorporates a phosphoramidate group to interact with the PSMA catalytic zinc atoms. The scope of the analog library was designed to test the importance of various functional groups to the inhibitory potency of the lead phosphoramidate. The IC(50) for the lead phosphoramidate inhibitor was 35 nM while the IC(50) values for the analog library presented a range from 0.86 nM to 4.1 microM. Computational docking, utilizing a recently solved X-ray crystal structure of the recombinant protein, along with enzyme inhibition data, was used to propose a pharmacophore model for the PSMA active site.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2026.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
#1,349
of 7,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,362
of 79,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
#21
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.