↓ Skip to main content

Direct and Indirect Impairment of Human Dendritic Cell Function by Virulent Francisella tularensis Schu S4

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Immunity, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Direct and Indirect Impairment of Human Dendritic Cell Function by Virulent Francisella tularensis Schu S4
Published in
Infection and Immunity, November 2008
DOI 10.1128/iai.00879-08
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis causes acute, lethal pneumonic disease following infection with only 10 CFU. The mechanisms used by the bacterium to accomplish this in humans are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that virulent, type A F. tularensis strain Schu S4 efficiently infects and replicates in human myeloid dendritic cells (DCs). Despite exponential replication over time, Schu S4 failed to stimulate transforming growth factor beta, interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-6, IL-1beta, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor alpha, alpha interferon (IFN-alpha), and IFN-beta throughout the course of infection. Schu S4 also suppressed the ability of directly infected DCs to respond to different Toll-like receptor agonists. Furthermore, we also observed functional inhibition of uninfected bystander cells. This inhibition was mediated, in part, by a heat-stable bacterial component. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Schu S4 was present in Schu S4-conditioned medium. However, Schu S4 LPS was weakly inflammatory and failed to induce suppression of DCs at concentrations below 10 microg/ml, and depletion of Schu S4 LPS did not significantly alleviate the inhibitory effect of Schu S4-conditioned medium in uninfected human DCs. Together, these data show that type A F. tularensis interferes with the ability of a central cell type of the immune system, DCs, to alert the host of infection both intra- and extracellularly. This suggests that immune dysregulation by F. tularensis operates on a broader and more comprehensive scale than previously appreciated.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Immunity
#4,778
of 13,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,471
of 105,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Immunity
#26
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.