| Title |
A simple and efficient method for isolating small RNAs from different plant species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-7-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
FlordeFátima Rosas-Cárdenas, Noé Durán-Figueroa, Jean-Philippe Vielle-Calzada, Andrés Cruz-Hernández, Nayelli Marsch-Martínez, Stefan de Folter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 195 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 24% |
| Researcher | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 137 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,379,008
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#180
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,043
of 108,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.