↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms for Decreased Function of B Cells in Aged Mice and Humans

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms for Decreased Function of B Cells in Aged Mice and Humans
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, March 2008
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.2741
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The immune system has been known for some time to be compromised in aged individuals, e.g., both mice and humans, and in both humoral and cellular responses. Our studies have begun to elucidate intrinsic B lymphocyte defects in Ig class switch recombination, activation-induced cytidine deaminase, and E47 transcription factor expression. These defects occur in both mice and humans. Our studies have also shown that tristetraprolin is one of the key players in regulating the decreased E47 mRNA stability in aged B lymphocytes. These and current studies should lead to improvements in B lymphocyte function in aged populations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Vietnam 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Professor 6 9%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2026.
All research outputs
#3,081,495
of 32,572,212 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#1,472
of 33,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,614
of 127,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#11
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,572,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.