Through artificial water control in the shed of rain-free, this paper studied the physiological water requirement patterns of 2-3 years old Platycladus orientalis and Robinia pseudoacacia trees during their growth period, and the relationships between their transpiration water consumption and soil water supply. The results showed that the transpiration water consumption of Robinia pseudoacacia was increased with increasing soil water supply within the range of 40%-100% of field water-holding capacity. Its maximum transpiration water consumption was at the early and accelerating growth stages, accounted for 80.5% of total annual water consumption. The transpiration water consumption of Robinia pseudoacacia was 5.13 times as much as that of Platycladus orientalis. Platycladus orientalis had a peak value of transpiration water consumption when the soil moisture content was 40%-100% of field water-holding capacity. Its transpiration water consumption was the maximum at accelerating growth stage, accounted for 46.27% of total annual water consumption, next at later growth stage, and relatively small at early growth stage. The correction functions of transpiration water consumption to soil water supply and the time-soil moisture functions of practical transpiration water consumption under insufficient water supply for two test species were put forward for the first time.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,783,474
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#574
of 9,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,939
of 211,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#9
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
