| Title |
A systematic search for new mammalian noncoding RNAs indicates little conserved intergenic transcription
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-6-104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomas Babak, Benjamin J Blencowe, Timothy R Hughes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,632
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,263
of 57,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.