↓ Skip to main content

Impairment of the semantic network in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impairment of the semantic network in schizophrenia
Published in
Psychiatry Research, July 1996
DOI 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02901-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is well established that patients with schizophrenia display a variety of language impairments. Despite considerable research, however, the underlying mechanisms of the language deficits in schizophrenia remain unclear. Representations of semantic networks of 56 patients with schizophrenia and 28 normal comparison (NC) subjects of similar ages and educational levels were generated by multidimensional scaling and Pathfinder analyses of their responses on the Animal Fluency Test. On the basis of traditional scoring techniques (i.e., total number of correct animal names generated in 60 s), all patients performed significantly worse than the NC subjects. More detailed analyses of the underlying semantic networks revealed that performance in the patients varied according to age of onset and subtype of schizophrenia. The semantic network of patients with late-onset schizophrenia (i.e., with onset after age 45) was virtually identical to that of the NC group. In contrast, the semantic network of patients with a younger age of onset was disorganized and differed significantly from that of the NC subjects. Findings demonstrated that patients with nonparanoid subtypes displayed greater disorganization in their semantic networks than patients with a paranoid subtype. Although general fluency impairments (e.g., difficulties in initiation, retrieval, and search mechanisms) may be sensitive to schizophrenia, per se, specific deficits in the structure of semantic knowledge may be associated with certain characteristics of individual patients with schizophrenia, such as an earlier age of onset and nonparanoid subtype.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Argentina 2 3%
Virgin Islands, U.S. 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 45%
Neuroscience 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Linguistics 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2010.
All research outputs
#9,514,305
of 27,773,453 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research
#3,019
of 7,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,057
of 31,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,773,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them