↓ Skip to main content

Hypoalgesia in Response to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Depends on Stimulation Intensity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
34 patents

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hypoalgesia in Response to Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Depends on Stimulation Intensity
Published in
Journal of Pain, April 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.02.352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 192 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 12 6%
Professor 11 6%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Neuroscience 15 8%
Engineering 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 68 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2026.
All research outputs
#7,589,432
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain
#1,226
of 3,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,271
of 161,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.