↓ Skip to main content

An IFT-A Protein Is Required to Delimit Functionally Distinct Zones in Mechanosensory Cilia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An IFT-A Protein Is Required to Delimit Functionally Distinct Zones in Mechanosensory Cilia
Published in
Current Biology, December 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Lee, Elena Sivan-Loukianova, Daniel F. Eberl, Maurice J. Kernan

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,604,701
of 30,703,623 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#1,168
of 10,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,682
of 104,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#6
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,703,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.