↓ Skip to main content

Specific Reading and Phonological Processing Deficits are Associated with Damage to the Left Frontal Operculum

Overview of attention for article published in Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Specific Reading and Phonological Processing Deficits are Associated with Damage to the Left Frontal Operculum
Published in
Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior, January 2006
DOI 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70399-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A. Fiez, Daniel Tranel, Daunye Seager-Frerichs, Hanna Damasio

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies in normal subjects indicate that a region in the left frontal operculum (FO) is more active when subjects read pronounceable nonwords as compared to most word types. Here, we report convergent evidence on this finding using the lesion method. We tested the prediction that subjects with left FO damage would have impaired reading of pronounceable nonwords, but relatively intact reading of most word types. Eleven target subjects with circumscribed left FO lesions, and two comparison groups of either brain-damaged or normal subjects matched to the target subjects for age, sex, handedness, and education, were studied using reading tasks derived from previous neuroimaging work. As predicted, the FO group was significantly less accurate than the comparison groups at reading nonwords. By contrast, the FO subjects showed relatively intact word reading, a pattern consistent with the syndrome of "phonological dyslexia". The FO subjects, however, did exhibit particular difficulty reading low frequency words with inconsistent grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences (e.g., PINT), which parallels the finding from functional imaging studies that reading such items produces more activation in left FO than reading high frequency words and low frequency words with consistent grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences (e.g., JADE) (Fiez et al., 1999). In several follow-up experiments, we found that the FO subjects were also impaired on other phonological tasks that have been associated with left frontal opercular activation in functional neuroimaging studies. The findings converge nicely with extant functional imaging work, and provide further evidence that regions within the left FO are part of a system that makes specific and critical contributions to some of the phonological processes that support reading.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 115 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Linguistics 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#12,343,598
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior
#1,649
of 3,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,906
of 236,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.