↓ Skip to main content

Role of central 5-HT2 receptors in mediating head bobs and body shakes in the rabbit

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Role of central 5-HT2 receptors in mediating head bobs and body shakes in the rabbit
Published in
Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, March 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.pbb.2003.12.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Systemic administration of the 5-HT(2A/2C) agonist DOI [(1(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane)hydrochloride] in rabbits elicits head bobs and body shakes, which are mediated by 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors, respectively. This study was designed to determine whether the receptors mediating these behaviors are primarily located in the brain or in the periphery. Systemic administration of the peripheral 5-HT(2A/2C) antagonist xylamidine 30 min before systemic DOI challenge attenuated DOI-elicited body shakes by 50% without an effect on head bobs, suggesting a central origin for head bobs and a partial peripheral and a partial central origin for body shakes. Central administration of DOI into the lateral ventricle (ICV) elicited head bobs but not body shakes, demonstrating that the receptors mediating head bobs are centrally located. Pretreatment with ICV xylamidine blocked head bobs elicited by ICV DOI, indicating that the lack of inhibition, when systemically administered, is due to xylamidine's failure to reach central receptors. ICV pretreatment with the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist ketanserin inhibited ICV DOI-elicited head bobs establishing that 5-HT(2A) receptors activation elicits head bobs. In conclusion, 5-HT(2A) receptors mediating head movements are located in the brain whereas 5-HT(2C) receptors mediating the body movements appear to be located at different central sites as well as in the periphery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Neuroscience 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2026.
All research outputs
#12,425,541
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
#1,661
of 4,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,901
of 88,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.