↓ Skip to main content

The RING domain of RING Finger 11 (RNF11) protein binds Ubc13 and inhibits formation of polyubiquitin chains

Overview of attention for article published in Febs Letters, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The RING domain of RING Finger 11 (RNF11) protein binds Ubc13 and inhibits formation of polyubiquitin chains
Published in
Febs Letters, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/1873-3468.13029
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Really Interesting New Gene (RING) Finger protein 11 (RNF11) is a subunit of the A20 ubiquitin-editing complex that ensures the transient nature of inflammatory responses. Although the role of RNF11 as a negative regulator of NF-κB signalling is well-documented, the molecular mechanisms that underpin this function are poorly understood. Here, we show that RNF11 binds both Ubc13 and the Ubc13~ubiquitin conjugate tightly and with similar affinity, but has minimal E3 ligase activity. Remarkably, RNF11 appears to bind Ubc13 so tightly that it outcompetes the E1 and an active E3 ligase. As a consequence, RNF11 may regulate the activity of E3s that rely on Ubc13 for ubiquitin chain assembly by limiting the availability of Ubc13 and its conjugate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,003,819
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#3,610
of 17,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,271
of 372,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#29
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.