↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Informal Caregiver Challenges for Advanced Cancer Patients During End-of-Life Care in Johannesburg, South Africa and Distinctions Based on Place of Death
Published in
Journal of Pain & Symptom Management, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.03.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, late diagnosis with cancer is common. Many dying patients rely on family members for care; little is known about the challenges African informal caregivers face. To better understand the challenges of informal caregivers at the end-of-life in South Africa, both at home and in inpatient facilities. We included advanced cancer patients and caregivers from a public hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Study nurses interviewed patients and caregivers about their experiences. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we determined the factors associated with greater caregiver difficulty, focusing on patients dying at home versus in inpatient facilities. Among 174 patients, 62 caregivers (36%) reported "a lot" of challenges. These caregivers struggled most with keeping the patient clean (16%) and with patient interactions (34%). Symptoms associated with greater difficulty included pain (odds ratio (OR) 2.4, [95%CI 1.2, 4.7]), urinary incontinence (OR 2.3, [95%CI 1.1, 4.9]), fecal incontinence (OR 2.4, [95%CI 1.0, 5.7]), insomnia (OR 2.9, [95%CI 1.3, 6.9]), fatigue (OR 6.3, [95%CI 1.8, 21.6]), extremity weakness (OR 2.9, [95%CI 1.3, 6.9]), shame (OR 4.2, [95%CI 1.5, 12.0]) and sadness (OR 2.3, [95%CI 1.1, 4.8]). Caregivers of patients dying at home reported the greatest difficulty with patients' physical symptoms; caregivers of those dying in facilities reported the greatest difficulty with emotional symptoms. Informal caregivers of patients dying at home reported challenges with practical functional care; this effect was reduced in the inpatient setting. Skills training for these caregivers could relieve some of this burden.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 77 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Psychology 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 86 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#24,787,356
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#3,886
of 4,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,711
of 372,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
#38
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.