↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamic Characteristics of Guanosine-5′-monophosphate Reductase Complexes Revealed by High-Resolution 31P Field-Cycling NMR Relaxometry
Published in
Biochemistry, March 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00142
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ability of enzymes to modulate the dynamics of bound substrates and cofactors is a critical feature of catalysis, but the role of dynamics has largely been approached from the perspective of the protein. Here, we use an underappreciated NMR technique, subtesla high-resolution field-cycling 31P NMR relaxometry, to interrogate the dynamics of enzyme bound substrates and cofactors in guanosine-5'-monophosphate reductase (GMPR). These experiments reveal distinct binding modes and dynamic profiles associated with the 31P nuclei in the Michaelis complexes for the deamination and hydride transfer steps of the catalytic cycle. Importantly, the substrate is constrained and the cofactor is more dynamic in the deamination complex E·GMP·NADP+, whereas the substrate is more dynamic and the cofactor is constrained in the hydride transfer complex E·IMP·NADP+. The presence of D2O perturbed the relaxation of the 31P nuclei in E·IMP·NADP+ but not in E·GMP·NADP+, providing further evidence of distinct binding modes with different dynamic properties. dIMP and dGMP are poor substrates, and the dynamics of the cofactor complexes of dGMP/dIMP are disregulated relative to GMP/IMP. The substrate 2'-OH interacts with Asp219, and mutation of Asp219 to Ala decreases the value of Vmax by a factor of 30. Counterintuitively, loss of Asp219 makes both substrates and cofactors less dynamic. These observations suggest that the interactions between the substrate 2'-OH and Asp219 coordinate the dynamic properties of the Michaelis complexes, and these dynamics are important for progression through the catalytic cycle.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Chemistry 2 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,584,772
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#19,526
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,432
of 337,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#103
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.