Black, K, Slater, J, Brown, RC, and Cooke, R. Low energy availability, plasma lipids, and hormonal profiles of recreational athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2018-It has been postulated that low energy availability (LEA) impacts bone health, hormonal concentrations, and cardiovascular function. This study describes the lipid levels, hormonal profiles, and nutrient intakes of recreationally active adults at risk of LEA compared with those not at risk. Thirty-eight women who meet or exceed the New Zealand guidelines for physical activity participated. Each participant completed an online questionnaire including the Low Energy Availability in Females questionnaire (LEAF-Q), demographic questions, and daily exercise to determine energy expenditure. Participants also provided a weighed 3-day diet record, a blood sample analyzed for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and cortisol, and a saliva sample analyzed for testosterone. Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance. Those classed as at risk of LEA according to the LEAF-Q showed very likely lower energy availability (at risk: mean, 36.3 [95% confidence interval, 30.8-41.7] kcal·kg·FFMd vs. not at risk: mean, 47.5 [95% CI, 39.5-55.4] kcal·kg·FFMd) and lower calcium intakes (mean, 847 [95% CI, 695-998] mg, vs. mean, 1488 [95% CI, 690-2,286] mg). Those at risk also had a likely small lower T3 concentration of 1.78 (SD: 0.36) nmol·L compared with 2.01 (SD: 0.53) nmol·L for those not at risk. These data suggest that recreationally active female subjects classed as at risk of LEA according to the LEAF-Q also have lower energy availability as determined by diet records and exercise diaries. The results also suggests that those at risk of LEA have reductions in T3, and their low energy intake, in addition to a low calcium intake, could put them at an increased risk of poor bone health.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#10,130,713
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#4,012
of 7,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,581
of 385,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#49
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
