↓ Skip to main content

Medical applications of array CGH and the transformation of clinical cytogenetics

Overview of attention for article published in Cytogenetic and Genome Research, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Medical applications of array CGH and the transformation of clinical cytogenetics
Published in
Cytogenetic and Genome Research, November 2006
DOI 10.1159/000095928
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) merges molecular diagnostics with traditional chromosome analysis and is transforming the field of cytogenetics. Prospective studies of individuals with developmental delay and dysmorphic features have demonstrated that array CGH has the ability to detect any genomic imbalance including deletions, duplications, aneuploidies and amplifications. Detection rates for chromosome abnormalities with array CGH range from 5-17% in individuals with normal results from prior routine cytogenetic testing. In addition, copy number variants (CNVs) were identified in all studies. These CNVs may include large-scale variation and can confound the diagnostic interpretations. Although cytogeneticists will require additional training and laboratories must become appropriately equipped, array CGH holds the promise of being the initial diagnostic tool in the identification of visible and submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities in mental retardation and other developmental disabilities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2010.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Cytogenetic and Genome Research
#3
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,220
of 169,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytogenetic and Genome Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them