↓ Skip to main content

Generation of liquid water on Mars through the melting of a dusty snowpack

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, October 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Generation of liquid water on Mars through the melting of a dusty snowpack
Published in
ICARUS, October 1987
DOI 10.1016/0019-1035(87)90123-0
Authors

Gary D. Clow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 53%
Physics and Astronomy 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,513
of 5,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,493
of 11,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.