↓ Skip to main content

Increasing nurses' emotional intelligence with a brief intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Nursing Research, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Increasing nurses' emotional intelligence with a brief intervention
Published in
Applied Nursing Research, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.04.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Emotional intelligence (EI) is associated with a wide range of personal, professional and social benefits with numerous applications evident for nursing education and clinical practice. Despite growing support for increasing the focus on EI in nursing and nurse education, empirical evidence for the effectiveness of training to increase EI is sparse. The aim with this study was to test the effect of a brief EI training program for registered nurses. We conducted a cross-site quasi-experimental study measuring nurses' EI pre- (T1) and three months post- (T2) EI training with a matched (untrained) control group (total n = 60). EI training consisted of a five-hour workshop, a 30-minute one-on-one feedback session, and an individualised follow-up reminder sent via SMS. Training resulted in a significant increase in EI scores over baseline levels for the trained group while scores for the control group did not increase. This pilot study has provided clear evidence of the applicability and efficacy of a low-cost training intervention for nursing staff in a real world setting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 54 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 25%
Psychology 21 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 57 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,642,887
of 27,057,185 outputs
Outputs from Applied Nursing Research
#298
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,404
of 346,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Nursing Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,057,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them