↓ Skip to main content

Biologically inspired oxidation catalysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
828 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biologically inspired oxidation catalysis
Published in
Nature, September 2008
DOI 10.1038/nature07371
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of processes for selective hydrocarbon oxidation is a goal that has long been pursued. An additional challenge is to make such processes environmentally friendly, for example by using non-toxic reagents and energy-efficient catalytic methods. Excellent examples are naturally occurring iron- or copper-containing metalloenzymes, and extensive studies have revealed the key chemical principles that underlie their efficacy as catalysts for aerobic oxidations. Important inroads have been made in applying this knowledge to the development of synthetic catalysts that model enzyme function. Such biologically inspired hydrocarbon oxidation catalysts hold great promise for wide-ranging synthetic applications.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 828 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
Germany 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 787 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 239 29%
Researcher 121 15%
Student > Master 98 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 43 5%
Other 113 14%
Unknown 156 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 489 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 5%
Engineering 25 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 3%
Chemical Engineering 19 2%
Other 58 7%
Unknown 175 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2025.
All research outputs
#4,696,673
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#55,502
of 90,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,977
of 87,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#332
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.